Home   »   Blog

Schnelltests: Wie zuverlässig sind sie bei Infektionen?

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Understanding Schnelltests
  3. Reliability of Schnelltests
    1. Sensitivity and Specificity
    2. Factors Affecting Reliability
  4. Company Solutions
    1. Company 1: Roche Diagnostics
    2. Company 2: Abbott Laboratories
    3. Company 3: Siemens Healthineers
  5. Conclusion
  6. References

Introduction

Schnelltests, or rapid antigen tests, have become a critical tool in managing infectious diseases, especially during pandemics. These tests provide quick results, aiding in timely decision-making processes. Understanding their reliability is essential for healthcare professionals and policymakers.

Understanding Schnelltests

Schnelltests are designed to detect the presence of specific viral antigens in a sample, usually within a few minutes to half an hour. They are favored for their speed and ease of use compared to more definitive but time-consuming PCR tests.

Reliability of Schnelltests

Sensitivity and Specificity

The reliability of Schnelltests is primarily evaluated through two metrics: sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity refers to the test's ability to correctly identify those with the infection (true positives), whereas specificity indicates its ability to correctly identify those without the infection (true negatives).

For example, a typical rapid antigen test might have a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 98%. This implies that 20% of infected individuals may receive a false negative result, while 2% of uninfected individuals may receive a false positive result.

Factors Affecting Reliability

Several factors can influence the reliability of Schnelltests:

  • Viral load: The accuracy of the test increases with higher viral loads.
  • Time since infection: Tests are more reliable when conducted during the period of peak viral shedding, typically within the first week of symptom onset.
  • Sample collection: Proper sample collection is crucial; improper technique can lead to inaccurate results.

Company Solutions

Company 1: Roche Diagnostics

Roche offers the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test with a sensitivity of 84.5% and specificity of 99.5%, as reported in independent trials. Their tests are widely used due to their high accuracy and are manufactured following stringent quality control measures.

Company 2: Abbott Laboratories

Abbott's Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device boasts a sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 99.8%. The test is recognized for its reliability in detecting high viral loads, crucial for effective infection control.

Company 3: Siemens Healthineers

Siemens Healthineers offers the CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test, which has a sensitivity of 86.5% and specificity of 99.7%. The test has been adopted in multiple healthcare settings due to its fast turnaround time and ease of use.

Conclusion

While Schnelltests provide a rapid and convenient method for detecting infections, their reliability varies based on several factors, including viral load and timing of the test. Companies like Roche, Abbott, and Siemens have developed solutions with high specificity and varied sensitivity, offering valuable tools in the management of infectious diseases.

References

  1. Roche Diagnostics. (2023). SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Product Information.
  2. Abbott Laboratories. (2023). Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device Specifications.
  3. Siemens Healthineers. (2023). CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test Technical Data.

User keyword search:Schnelltest für Infektionskrankheiten

brand gives you a solution